User talk:Navanax

Speedy deletion of Tom edwards (geographer)

A tag has been placed on Tom edwards (geographer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 21:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

advice

The replacement article Tom Edwards, does seem to me to show notability,so I removed a proposed deletion tag on it/. However, it had 3 problems

. It appeared to be copied from some other web site
. It was written in terms of praise and self-advertisment.
. It has no references.

I have rewritten it to deal with #1` and #2,but it now must have at least one good 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases), or it may well be deleted. I'd advise you to add this very quickly, before it gets nominated for regular deletion.DGG (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Murderbike (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tom Edwards (geographer)

I have nominated Tom Edwards (geographer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Edwards (geographer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongo matic 20:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest guideline

Hello, Navanax. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kate Edwards, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]